Inter- dokumentoborot.

http://ecmclub. blogspot. com/2010/02/blog-post_11. html. ) Two months ago will be continued.
We at PC Week today passed temobzor for EDS, which I have prepared several publications. Here is one of them just about Meadow:. http://www. pcweek. ru / themes / detail. php? ID = 122843.

Then, in February, constructive discussion did not work. Maybe I'm wrong to set the vector of the discussion. Perhaps, the theme of the audience seemed uninteresting. Perhaps the audience does not:-(.

However, look what happens.

In the last couple of years postaschiki EDS is talking about some problems that inter-organizational workflow. It is not very clear here that.
a. Who turned these conversations?.
2. If they are addressed to the public ( m. e. beyond a narrow group of dedicated ), then, frankly, neither are any urgency of the problem is not very clear from these conversations. It seems that the conversations are about some things other than vendors who cares,.
3. Even less clear: if there is a problem, then who and how to decide? .

At the same time, all the same public sees (reads): The government is concerned about the problem! . That is accepted and even seem to comply with a decision:. http://doc. cnews. ru / reviews / index. shtml? 2009/11/03/368422.

That's it! .

Now the ECM / DMS professionals ask: Well, what do you think about this Meadow? .
Talk to the post, which have been identified, these issues were reduced to the advice of the author writing to learn the basics ECM.

Yet the question still moved Meadow (at least in my opinion ) off the ground. Thanks to the initiative of ' IT ' is understandable to present his vision public. In this regard, I want to pay attention: in an interview said it was an industry-wide problems.
But the conversation does not zakonken. By the way, not all speaking and ended up in the text:-).